There's a monumental library of rock hits from the 70s-present that hardly get any airplay, if at all. The 80s are hardly represented in rock radio...at least around here. Alot of the 80s bands had more hits than what's played on the radio nowadays. Heck, alot of the 70s rock bands had more hits than what's played on the radio now. With that many songs at one's disposal there should be no need to play the same songs every two hours.
Are these titles you are talking about still popular today? I don't care if they were hits yesterday. Are they still hits today? Please give me three examples of songs from each era that should be played that are not.
What station, day, and time did you hear the same songs get played every two hours?
Again, I'm not trying to be a smart ass here. I'm asking these questions for the interest of the discussion.
My problem isn't that Nickelsuck is played so much....my question is WHY is it played so much? Why do people like this band?? And why is Hinder so popular?
It's easy for one to play armchair PD...but dude...why the oversaturation of crap??
For the same reason we still have to hear about the Beatles and why Nirvana was so popular. People have shitty taste in music. This is why Titanic was such a popular movie and why American Idol is such a popular TV show. By and large, people love crap.
These bands being mentioned -- Nickelback, Journey, Foreigner, Loverboy, Creed, etc -- give me access to the genre. I like them. Without them, I'd never find a way in.....
Which is why many "rockers" reject these bands. They are right on the line between rock and pop. Pop people consider them rock. Rock people consider them pop. The average listener (most of whom have no such identification) do not know or care about genre. They just like what they like. The hard part of programming a rock station is not playing so much of this stuff that your P1s and Super P1s rebel. However some of the P1s and a great portion of P2s love this music, so you have to give it to them. The great news for rock formats is that these "lines" are fading. An even better development is the old fight bewteen "new" rock and "classic" rock is totally gone now, save for the few holdouts whom are an insignificant number.
Yes, Seattle stuff sucks.
Alice In Chains and Soundgarden belie that statement. Pearl Jam (except for their first album) and Nirvana support it.
Yes, Beatles suck(ed). They suck, they suck, they suck.
Fuckin' A. They were the first boy band. They were never rock. They were never geniuses. They innovated nothing. They did not write great songs.
This is not an invitation to get into the same old argument with Beatles fans. Just go out a buy the new rehashing of the same old crap they'll inevitably put out soon and leave everybody alone. Dillweeds.