JB, you gotta ignore HD...he's just baiting you into wasting your time. He, like all leftist operatives, has been trained over the last years to combine the "make up 'Big Lie'-ish euphemisms" strategy of George Lackhoff with the "kill the enemies of communism...physically, if you have to, but try character, reputation, livelihood, and business first" tactics of Saul Olinsky.
An easy application of that is "put the truth on the defense by lying about the truth." The left's belief is that, once the lie has been introduced, the truth must always play "catch up," forever trying just to get back to "zero." And it works -- or can, at the least -- because truth actually cares about the truth while the left has no such concern. So, if you watch what HD does, you'll see him do not only the usual "deflect, then distract by changing the subject" thing but also be sure to introduce a new lie and/or add an "attack the attacker" that is a lie such that his opponent, he believes, is angered and placed on defense. All subsequent posts from him will follow the same pattern, provoking more outrage and advancing a new or expanded lie rather than addressing the actual substance of what you replied.
As tough as it might seem, ignore what he's saying (he's ignoring the real substance of what
you're saying) if it puts you in "catch up" mode and just tell the truth. If you really want to play his game, then play his game...but, of course, with the truth, not a manufactured lie. Stoke his emotion, include an overt or implied attack on him, and maintain forward momentum.
Hoosier Daddy wrote:...and raise my kids to be honest, decent, hardworking, productive adults.
No man can reproduce what he does not possess, and
no leftist is honest, decent, hard-working, or productive for society. Because you are training your children to lie, be dependent, and create other dependents, what you claim to want will be impossible for you realize.
What does Obama have that Palin doesn't?
Intelligence.
Oh, gosh, no. I'm sure there's some Ivy League, pseudo-intellectual term for it (God help us if they, themselves, think it's real), but Obama has learned what we in English composition class back in school called "verbal BS" and "factual BS." A combination of high-falutin' vocabulary and the occasional factoid, it absolutely fools the unintelligent (even though possibly very edumacated) every time...it's no surprise that you, too, have been suckered.
Vision.
"Introduce communism via euphemism in the midst of manufactured crisis" is
not "vision." Communism is a violation of the design of man and, thus, ultimately fails every time no matter who does it. Even those who practice it know it will ultimately fail but work to delay it with barriers, restrictions, and murder.
Direction.
The left has none....except "to the left." There are no principles on the left, so no direction but "power and rewards for the anointed and their anointed" is even possible.
A knowledge of history.
Largely irrelevant, I think. Given that we have no idea if what history we read is true, knowing what is likely horribly inaccurate (at best) is unnecessary. Knowing math, science, logic, and the present is much, much more preferable.
Familiarity with National and International politics.
I was about to disagree but noticed you specified "politics." "Politics" often have not a thing to do with reality and the truth, so you might be right.
The ability to form a complete and gramatically correct sentence.
Palin rocks...it's Obama I've heard make umpteen mistakes (run-on sentences are inevitably killers,
especially for those who've been edumacated beyond their intelligence). Besides, "uh.................," "eh........," "aaaaaaaaaannnnnnd," and "umm..............." cannot be considered as real words in "complete and grammatically-correct sentences." (Please note that you made
two mistakes in your claim to want that...it's yet another attribute you claim to want but will find impossible to find.)
I agree in principle, but I always felt my elected officials should have a certain intelligence, a air of dignity, the ability to make good judgment based on a variety of information and knowledge, and someone who didn't use the office and power to exercise personal vendattas.

Naw....we know you're a lefty! There's not a single Democrat about whom you can honestly make that statement!
And you know it!
That....is checkmate.
There you go, JB!