Full StoryPHILADELPHIA - A federal appeals court on Monday threw out a $550,000 indecency fine against CBS Corp. for the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show that ended with Janet Jackson's breast-baring "wardrobe malfunction."
Court tosses FCC 'wardrobe malfunction' fine
Moderators: The People's DJ, David Paleg
- The-Hammer
- Member

- Posts: 167
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 11:02 pm
Court tosses FCC 'wardrobe malfunction' fine
Anthony DiNozzo: "I'm a white male between the ages of 18 and 49 with a loud mouth and a gun. I am the American Dream."
"Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't understand it" - Ambrose's Corollary to Clarke's Third Law.
"Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't understand it" - Ambrose's Corollary to Clarke's Third Law.
-
Bob Campbell
- Member

- Posts: 2232
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 12:13 pm
- Location: Blue Heaven
Re: Court tosses FCC 'wardrobe malfunction' fine
And commons sense wins one...til the appeal at least.
-
AmpedNow
- Member

- Posts: 2415
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 4:46 am
- Location: none
Re: Court tosses FCC 'wardrobe malfunction' fine
I will concede that it was the wrong venue for that kind of programming, but it was far from "shock treatment"... I mean, geez. It was a half-second of a star-covered boob, not a Max Hardcore scene.The court said the FCC deviated from its nearly 30-year practice of fining indecent broadcast programming only when it was so "pervasive as to amount to 'shock treatment' for the audience."
I still say this was all because it was an election year... Why would they say one thing the year before, only to do a 180 a few months later, without warning?Shortly after the 2004 Super Bowl, the FCC changed its policy on fleeting indecency following an NBC broadcast of the Golden Globes awards show on which U2 lead singer Bono uttered an unscripted expletive. The FCC said at the time that the F-word in any context "inherently has a sexual connotation" and can trigger enforcement.
And no, the F word does not "inherently have a sexual connotation" in any context. But, that's a different topic.
This case is one thing. But the SC case this fall is the big one to watch.